"Muslims Kill Washington Post Journalist"...and other stories best left untold
"Muslims Kill Washington Post Journalist"...and other stories best left untold"
That would be one headline. And, an accurate one, I might add, regarding the brutal murder of Jamal Khashoggi, an exiled dissident Saudi Journalist working for The Washington Post. Khashoggi was murdered by Muslims at a Saudi consulate in Istanbul.
Another headline might read: “Trump refuses to kill the $150,000,000,000 American Investment Deal with the Saudi’s by Overreacting With Very Little Evidence, Regarding Who’s Guilty, To One More In a Long String of Murderous Human Rights Abuses by More Than a Few of the Hundreds of Millions of Muslims Living in the Region Who Regularly Engage in Such Hideous Practices.”
Admittedly, it’s a long headline, but it’s also true.
Instead, the usual suspects; The Media/The Democrats, decided to make the killing of Jamal Khashoggi the reason we should kill billions of dollars of investment in the U.S. by those same Saudi’s. That was the subtext of more than a few of the articles I’ve read. In other words, the murder, which was horrific, was the pretext for making the murder about President Trump’s big money investment deal, and how he (Trump,) refused to just come out and attack the Saudi prince and quash the deal. “Oh...we guess Donald Trump doesn’t care about this horrific crime!” said CNN. “Otherwise, he’d take the high road and kill the deal.” That way we could say “See...Donald Trump is a complete failure, the Saudi’s aren’t investing in America after all! Ha!”
My God! I hate these people!
In reality, concern for journalists didn’t even qualify as the lowest hanging fruit for more than a fair share of media partisans—and many Democrats, too. Except, as a cudgel to beat the president with. But it sounds “Credible,” and that was what really mattered.
The one headline I’ve yet to read is this: “This Gruesome Killing of Jamal Khashoggi is Par For The Course For Muslim Countries in the Region.”
But that would be Islamaphobic. Meaning, to state the obvious about the behavior of far too many Muslims, living in Muslim countries...that’s bad! That’s “Hate speech.” Attacking the president, on the other hand, in the middle of a difficult negotiation that could end up bringing huge investment to America makes Trump look good and the media look bad. Thus, the press attacks the president anyway, hoping to kill the deal. It’s an all or nothing strategy. For “The Resistance Media,” this story is just too big an opportunity to miss.
Make no mistake, the Democrats eagerly ignore Islamic atrocities here and abroad, daily, using every form of subterfuge and self-hypnosis to do so, and they only care when it’s politically expedient. With the midterms coming up, expediency doesn’t begin to cut it. For The Democrats, it’s a big gamble. But it’s pretty much all they have…“Attack! Attack! Slander! Lie! Steal! Manipulate!” There’s just too damned much money and power at stake to do anything else.
Now, I’m not, in any way, diminishing this horrific crime. But, as I said before, this is par for the course for Muslim extremists countries in the region. Who’ve consistently engaged in far worse crimes than this, I might add.
Does that sound like Islamaphobia? Let’s see how the usual suspects answer the question.
You’d think that politicians and presidents—for many decades now—didn’t know that Saudi Arabia was a very iffy, dangerous actor in Middle East politics, while still being an ally....more or less. This, of course, is complete horseshit. The very same media/Democrat tactic was used in The Russian Collusion Fable. Does it matter that the leftwing of the Democrat Party hold what are essentially Marxist political beliefs and economic principals high, as a role model for their own totalitarian stately ambitions? Look at virtually any policy offered by Jerry Brown, Bernie Sanders, Andrew Gillum, or Alexandria Ocasio Cortez, for instance, and you’ll see what I mean. The reality is the Democrats have pushed themselves back into a dark socialist corner with few options.
Anyway. This is just more of the same. The Democrats would slander their mothers if it would give them a shot at The House and Senate. I mean, did they care when Obama gave the Iranians many, many billions of dollars to sign a treaty, ratified by no one but Obama and The Iranians? Of course not. You see, it isn’t really a treaty unless Congress signs off on it. And Congress never did. Because Obama knew that even The Democrats weren’t that dumb! “You want us to sign what? A treaty giving the Iranians what translates into about a trillion dollars in American currency, thus, vastly enriching the greatest state sponsor of terror in the world, which we know, beyond a shadow of a doubt, will be used to kill Americans? Even we’re not that dumb!” The Party faithful proclaimed.
Even so...the press universally hailed “Obama’s Treaty” as a major win. If not for America, well...that was a mere technicality. After all, we need to be fair to our enemies too, so that they win now and again! Just consider it Affirmative Action for our deadliest adversaries.” said the Progressives, who were racing headlong towards hell like a rocket-car trying to break a land-speed record.
Obama responded to this criticism by arguing that Iran was seconds away from getting The Bomb, and, that his treaty would deal with this looming menace. "Pronto!"
This lead to The Republicans saying “Why didn’t you do something about it before now? You’ve had almost 8 years?
To which the press said “Huh?”
As stated previously...”My God! I hate these people!”
Mark Magula
That would be one headline. And, an accurate one, I might add, regarding the brutal murder of Jamal Khashoggi, an exiled dissident Saudi Journalist working for The Washington Post. Khashoggi was murdered by Muslims at a Saudi consulate in Istanbul.
Another headline might read: “Trump refuses to kill the $150,000,000,000 American Investment Deal with the Saudi’s by Overreacting With Very Little Evidence, Regarding Who’s Guilty, To One More In a Long String of Murderous Human Rights Abuses by More Than a Few of the Hundreds of Millions of Muslims Living in the Region Who Regularly Engage in Such Hideous Practices.”
Admittedly, it’s a long headline, but it’s also true.
Instead, the usual suspects; The Media/The Democrats, decided to make the killing of Jamal Khashoggi the reason we should kill billions of dollars of investment in the U.S. by those same Saudi’s. That was the subtext of more than a few of the articles I’ve read. In other words, the murder, which was horrific, was the pretext for making the murder about President Trump’s big money investment deal, and how he (Trump,) refused to just come out and attack the Saudi prince and quash the deal. “Oh...we guess Donald Trump doesn’t care about this horrific crime!” said CNN. “Otherwise, he’d take the high road and kill the deal.” That way we could say “See...Donald Trump is a complete failure, the Saudi’s aren’t investing in America after all! Ha!”
My God! I hate these people!
In reality, concern for journalists didn’t even qualify as the lowest hanging fruit for more than a fair share of media partisans—and many Democrats, too. Except, as a cudgel to beat the president with. But it sounds “Credible,” and that was what really mattered.
The one headline I’ve yet to read is this: “This Gruesome Killing of Jamal Khashoggi is Par For The Course For Muslim Countries in the Region.”
But that would be Islamaphobic. Meaning, to state the obvious about the behavior of far too many Muslims, living in Muslim countries...that’s bad! That’s “Hate speech.” Attacking the president, on the other hand, in the middle of a difficult negotiation that could end up bringing huge investment to America makes Trump look good and the media look bad. Thus, the press attacks the president anyway, hoping to kill the deal. It’s an all or nothing strategy. For “The Resistance Media,” this story is just too big an opportunity to miss.
Make no mistake, the Democrats eagerly ignore Islamic atrocities here and abroad, daily, using every form of subterfuge and self-hypnosis to do so, and they only care when it’s politically expedient. With the midterms coming up, expediency doesn’t begin to cut it. For The Democrats, it’s a big gamble. But it’s pretty much all they have…“Attack! Attack! Slander! Lie! Steal! Manipulate!” There’s just too damned much money and power at stake to do anything else.
Now, I’m not, in any way, diminishing this horrific crime. But, as I said before, this is par for the course for Muslim extremists countries in the region. Who’ve consistently engaged in far worse crimes than this, I might add.
Does that sound like Islamaphobia? Let’s see how the usual suspects answer the question.
You’d think that politicians and presidents—for many decades now—didn’t know that Saudi Arabia was a very iffy, dangerous actor in Middle East politics, while still being an ally....more or less. This, of course, is complete horseshit. The very same media/Democrat tactic was used in The Russian Collusion Fable. Does it matter that the leftwing of the Democrat Party hold what are essentially Marxist political beliefs and economic principals high, as a role model for their own totalitarian stately ambitions? Look at virtually any policy offered by Jerry Brown, Bernie Sanders, Andrew Gillum, or Alexandria Ocasio Cortez, for instance, and you’ll see what I mean. The reality is the Democrats have pushed themselves back into a dark socialist corner with few options.
Anyway. This is just more of the same. The Democrats would slander their mothers if it would give them a shot at The House and Senate. I mean, did they care when Obama gave the Iranians many, many billions of dollars to sign a treaty, ratified by no one but Obama and The Iranians? Of course not. You see, it isn’t really a treaty unless Congress signs off on it. And Congress never did. Because Obama knew that even The Democrats weren’t that dumb! “You want us to sign what? A treaty giving the Iranians what translates into about a trillion dollars in American currency, thus, vastly enriching the greatest state sponsor of terror in the world, which we know, beyond a shadow of a doubt, will be used to kill Americans? Even we’re not that dumb!” The Party faithful proclaimed.
Even so...the press universally hailed “Obama’s Treaty” as a major win. If not for America, well...that was a mere technicality. After all, we need to be fair to our enemies too, so that they win now and again! Just consider it Affirmative Action for our deadliest adversaries.” said the Progressives, who were racing headlong towards hell like a rocket-car trying to break a land-speed record.
Obama responded to this criticism by arguing that Iran was seconds away from getting The Bomb, and, that his treaty would deal with this looming menace. "Pronto!"
This lead to The Republicans saying “Why didn’t you do something about it before now? You’ve had almost 8 years?
To which the press said “Huh?”
As stated previously...”My God! I hate these people!”
Mark Magula