Dirty Deeds Done Dirt Cheap
Dirty Deeds Done Dirt Cheap
What about that Peter Strzok guy, FBI intelligence expert, and the man behind getting the ball rolling on the Mueller investigation?
Who?
You know! The FBI guy who sent 10,000 texts to his mistress about his loathing for Trump.
You know! The FBI guy who said “We need an insurance policy against Trump, should it look like he might win. Trump’s a scumbag! We need Hillary to win!”
You know! The guy who took the Russian created, fake anti-Trump, golden showers dossier, given to him by British spy Christopher Steele, which was paid for by the Clintons, to the tune of about seven million, and then passed it off to the press, who dutifully talked about it, even though they knew that it was unverifiable. Increasingly, it looks like this dossier was also used as a pretext for getting a FISA court warrant to spy on Trump and crew, enabling them to bug Trump towers, during the campaign. And the best part, all of the above is verifiable, unlike the actual dossier. You might have to filter through a lot of partisan crap to get to it, but the evidence is clearly there.
What???
Never heard these things? I bet. Evidence, in a court of law, IS NOT, listening to people you agree with, say things you agree with. There are two sides in a court proceeding. Not the side you like, and the one I like, but two sides. Unless you’re willing to listen to the other side objectively, you discredit your own opinion. Got it?
Huh???
I didn’t think so.
Sincerely, Boll Weevil Knievel
What about that Peter Strzok guy, FBI intelligence expert, and the man behind getting the ball rolling on the Mueller investigation?
Who?
You know! The FBI guy who sent 10,000 texts to his mistress about his loathing for Trump.
You know! The FBI guy who said “We need an insurance policy against Trump, should it look like he might win. Trump’s a scumbag! We need Hillary to win!”
You know! The guy who took the Russian created, fake anti-Trump, golden showers dossier, given to him by British spy Christopher Steele, which was paid for by the Clintons, to the tune of about seven million, and then passed it off to the press, who dutifully talked about it, even though they knew that it was unverifiable. Increasingly, it looks like this dossier was also used as a pretext for getting a FISA court warrant to spy on Trump and crew, enabling them to bug Trump towers, during the campaign. And the best part, all of the above is verifiable, unlike the actual dossier. You might have to filter through a lot of partisan crap to get to it, but the evidence is clearly there.
What???
Never heard these things? I bet. Evidence, in a court of law, IS NOT, listening to people you agree with, say things you agree with. There are two sides in a court proceeding. Not the side you like, and the one I like, but two sides. Unless you’re willing to listen to the other side objectively, you discredit your own opinion. Got it?
Huh???
I didn’t think so.
Sincerely, Boll Weevil Knievel