A Coven of Witches
A Coven of Witches
Finally, after more than a year, Mueller and team hit pay dirt, as the new Russian menace is revealed in the guise of Paul Manafort and Michael Cohen. Who knew the Russians were so near?
In response, President Trump calls it a witch hunt, triggering laughter from media covens around the world.
Not surprisingly, the press ignores completely what Mueller actually found, which has no bearing on his original mandate, Russian collusion?
But, wait a minute! Mueller also found a group of 12 Russian trolls that bought a $150K worth of Facebook ads. Thus, apparently, swinging the election away from Hillary Clinton, whose 1.2 billion dollar campaign expenditures just couldn’t handle the heat of those 12 Russian trolls. Even having the unflagging support of damn near all the global corporate media wasn’t enough to combat this hellish onslaught of supernaturally gifted trolls. Who, by the way, were as adamantly anti-trump as they were pro-Trump in their trolling.
“Yes! This makes sense to us!” proclaim the witches….I mean the media. “Besides, Mueller is simply following the evidence wherever it leads….as long as it leads to Trump.” they gleefully say. “I mean, if Trump isn't guilty of something...anything...no matter how small, he’s got nothing to worry about.” shout the witches...I mean the press.
In the case of Paul Manafort, the crimes he was convicted of have nothing to do with President Trump. Not even a little. Furthermore, Manafort had been deeply involved in political campaigns decades before Trump was a gleam in any politician’s eye. Manafort was the longtime business partner of Tony Podesta, who is the brother of John Podesta, former head of The Democratic National Committee, who also headed Hillary’s losing campaign against Donald Trump. (The incestuous nature of Washington politics and money runs deep.) Both men acted as “Foreign agents,” making millions as lobbyists for foreign countries, which is perfectly legal. Although, maybe it shouldn’t be. But that’s a different argument for a different day.
As far as Michael Cohen goes, he was targeted purely because he was President Trump’s personal consigliere, just as Lanny Davis, Cohen’s attorney, was the personal consigliere for the Clintons when Bill and Hill were in the White House.
How did that Happen, I wonder?
How did a 30-year deeper than deep Clinton insider become Michael Cohen’s attorney, convincing Cohen to cop a guilty plea to a lesser charge or, potentially, face life in prison?
Is Michael Cohen a Russian agent?
Hardly. As the judge in the Cohen case said: “Sometimes when you squeeze a person hard enough, you can get them to not only sing...but compose, as well.”
“But, the covens of media witches say; “Burn him! He’s a witch! Who else would know, if not us witches!” Immediately, the anti-Trumpers chimed in “He’s dirty! What about Trump’s tax returns, which will surely show he was taking money from the Russkies.”
Here is my moment for a bit editorializing: The FBI has Trump’s tax returns. Even the police can access a person’s tax returns if they have probable cause. Certainly Mueller has them as well and dug thru them with a fine-tooth comb, as did Comey and The FBI, and obviously, they found nothing.
How do I know this?
Because, if they had something, anything, it would have been leaked to the press, just as the three highest ranking members of The FBI leaked Intel to the press, and admitted that they leaked. Illegally, mind you. If the president's tax returns contained any incriminating info, those 12 Russian trolls wouldn’t be necessary to pad Mueller’s investigation. The fact that they're a part of this at all, tells you what you need to know.
Here’s an inside scoop, one that was largely ignored and broke with little fanfare: "The Witches"...I mean the media, spent a fair amount of money taking members of The FBI out to swanky dinner places, hoping to find some dirt on President Trump. But the media, as might be expected, simply ignored their own role in this scandal. Apparently, because it was them and not Trump.
Does anyone really expect Witches to out themselves?
Finally, James Comey, former head of The FBI exonerated President Trump of wrongdoing, including Russian collusion, more than a year ago, and he did so in front of Congress and the whole damned world, saying; “We found no evidence of collusion between President Trump and Russia.”
That should have ended it. But it didn’t. The Witches, aka, the global corporate media, simply ignored it and bulled ahead, looking for any incriminating evidence. Because, “Hey!” who knows better; The FBI, the most powerful investigative body on earth—or, some basic cable TV host with a partisan ax to grind? “Hmm?” If your answer is “Of course! That basic cable TV host is more credible!” Then, I suggest you get on your broom and start casting spells because anyone that dumb is going to need magic to help aid in their cause.
Finally, (I really mean it this time,) in legitimate scholarship circles—among historians, for instance—the most impressive and reliable evidence is when your enemy exonerates you. If your mom says something like: “He was such a good boy! I can’t believe that he’d commit a crime!" it doesn't mean a whole lot. Why is your mom lacking credibility? Because she’s your mother. Likewise, the least credible witness is the one who has the biggest ax to grind—and grinds away—whether it is a political ax or a personal one. That’s what makes the statements made by James Comey, the former head of The FBI, credible.
Believe me. I could easily go on. But for now, I’ll leave it there.
Mark Magula
Finally, after more than a year, Mueller and team hit pay dirt, as the new Russian menace is revealed in the guise of Paul Manafort and Michael Cohen. Who knew the Russians were so near?
In response, President Trump calls it a witch hunt, triggering laughter from media covens around the world.
Not surprisingly, the press ignores completely what Mueller actually found, which has no bearing on his original mandate, Russian collusion?
But, wait a minute! Mueller also found a group of 12 Russian trolls that bought a $150K worth of Facebook ads. Thus, apparently, swinging the election away from Hillary Clinton, whose 1.2 billion dollar campaign expenditures just couldn’t handle the heat of those 12 Russian trolls. Even having the unflagging support of damn near all the global corporate media wasn’t enough to combat this hellish onslaught of supernaturally gifted trolls. Who, by the way, were as adamantly anti-trump as they were pro-Trump in their trolling.
“Yes! This makes sense to us!” proclaim the witches….I mean the media. “Besides, Mueller is simply following the evidence wherever it leads….as long as it leads to Trump.” they gleefully say. “I mean, if Trump isn't guilty of something...anything...no matter how small, he’s got nothing to worry about.” shout the witches...I mean the press.
In the case of Paul Manafort, the crimes he was convicted of have nothing to do with President Trump. Not even a little. Furthermore, Manafort had been deeply involved in political campaigns decades before Trump was a gleam in any politician’s eye. Manafort was the longtime business partner of Tony Podesta, who is the brother of John Podesta, former head of The Democratic National Committee, who also headed Hillary’s losing campaign against Donald Trump. (The incestuous nature of Washington politics and money runs deep.) Both men acted as “Foreign agents,” making millions as lobbyists for foreign countries, which is perfectly legal. Although, maybe it shouldn’t be. But that’s a different argument for a different day.
As far as Michael Cohen goes, he was targeted purely because he was President Trump’s personal consigliere, just as Lanny Davis, Cohen’s attorney, was the personal consigliere for the Clintons when Bill and Hill were in the White House.
How did that Happen, I wonder?
How did a 30-year deeper than deep Clinton insider become Michael Cohen’s attorney, convincing Cohen to cop a guilty plea to a lesser charge or, potentially, face life in prison?
Is Michael Cohen a Russian agent?
Hardly. As the judge in the Cohen case said: “Sometimes when you squeeze a person hard enough, you can get them to not only sing...but compose, as well.”
“But, the covens of media witches say; “Burn him! He’s a witch! Who else would know, if not us witches!” Immediately, the anti-Trumpers chimed in “He’s dirty! What about Trump’s tax returns, which will surely show he was taking money from the Russkies.”
Here is my moment for a bit editorializing: The FBI has Trump’s tax returns. Even the police can access a person’s tax returns if they have probable cause. Certainly Mueller has them as well and dug thru them with a fine-tooth comb, as did Comey and The FBI, and obviously, they found nothing.
How do I know this?
Because, if they had something, anything, it would have been leaked to the press, just as the three highest ranking members of The FBI leaked Intel to the press, and admitted that they leaked. Illegally, mind you. If the president's tax returns contained any incriminating info, those 12 Russian trolls wouldn’t be necessary to pad Mueller’s investigation. The fact that they're a part of this at all, tells you what you need to know.
Here’s an inside scoop, one that was largely ignored and broke with little fanfare: "The Witches"...I mean the media, spent a fair amount of money taking members of The FBI out to swanky dinner places, hoping to find some dirt on President Trump. But the media, as might be expected, simply ignored their own role in this scandal. Apparently, because it was them and not Trump.
Does anyone really expect Witches to out themselves?
Finally, James Comey, former head of The FBI exonerated President Trump of wrongdoing, including Russian collusion, more than a year ago, and he did so in front of Congress and the whole damned world, saying; “We found no evidence of collusion between President Trump and Russia.”
That should have ended it. But it didn’t. The Witches, aka, the global corporate media, simply ignored it and bulled ahead, looking for any incriminating evidence. Because, “Hey!” who knows better; The FBI, the most powerful investigative body on earth—or, some basic cable TV host with a partisan ax to grind? “Hmm?” If your answer is “Of course! That basic cable TV host is more credible!” Then, I suggest you get on your broom and start casting spells because anyone that dumb is going to need magic to help aid in their cause.
Finally, (I really mean it this time,) in legitimate scholarship circles—among historians, for instance—the most impressive and reliable evidence is when your enemy exonerates you. If your mom says something like: “He was such a good boy! I can’t believe that he’d commit a crime!" it doesn't mean a whole lot. Why is your mom lacking credibility? Because she’s your mother. Likewise, the least credible witness is the one who has the biggest ax to grind—and grinds away—whether it is a political ax or a personal one. That’s what makes the statements made by James Comey, the former head of The FBI, credible.
Believe me. I could easily go on. But for now, I’ll leave it there.
Mark Magula